Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the quality of evidence in studies assessing the gold standard Biodex isokinetic dynamometer in Paralympic sports.
The Biodex isokinetic dynamometer is underutilized in Paralympic sports research, and existing studies lack standardized protocols, highlighting the need for methodological consistency in future research.
Biodex underutilized for Paralympic strength assessment; lack of standardization leaves open need for consistent protocols before clinical or research adoption.
Purpose Isokinetic dynamometers are machines that can supply multiple elements for measuring muscle strength, peak force, power, endurance, and angle of maximal force. The purpose of this study was to run a systematic review to find the quality of evidence in studies evaluating the gold standard isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex) in Paralympic sports. Methods The search strategy was defined as: (‘Paralympic’ OR ‘Paralympic sport’ OR ‘Parasport’ OR ‘disabled athlete’ OR ‘athletes with a disability’) AND (‘strength’ OR ‘isokinetic’ OR ‘torque’ OR ‘muscle strength dynamometer’ OR ‘isokinetic dynamometer’ OR ‘Biodex’). Four databases were searched: PubMed, Cochrane, ScienceDirect, and Scopus. Results From the 981 articles initially found, 10 records were finally included in this systematic review. Five articles were selected as high quality. The Biodex isokinetic dynamometer was introduced about 3 decades ago; still, a small number of papers (10) have been published on applying it in Paralympic sports. We observed different experimental protocols in the included studies. The shortage of standardization in the experimental protocols precludes pooling data for analyses. Conclusions As the Biodex isokinetic dynamometer is a gold standard, reliable, and valid instrument to measure human joint function, future research should apply it in Paralympic studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmadi et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: