PURPOSE: To evaluate in a long-term period the effectiveness and safety of topographically guided two-step laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and standard LASIK technique in the correction of refractive errors after successful penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) for keratoconus. METHODS: At least 2 years after PKP and 6 months after removal of all sutures, 15 eyes of 15 patients (Group 1; mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) -7.23 D -/+ 3.42 SD) were submitted to standard LASIK and 15 eyes of 15 patients (Group 2; mean MRSE -4.37 D -/+ 1.97 SD) to a topographically guided two-step LASIK procedure (first the flap and at least 2 weeks later the laser ablation). In all cases, a superior hinged corneal flap(160 microm/9.5 mm) was created. RESULTS: After a follow-up of 36 months, in Group 1 the mean uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 0.51 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) -/+ 0.41 SD and the mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.03 logMAR -/+ 0.05 SD, with a mean MRSE of -1.57 D -/+ 2.65 SD. In Group 2, the mean UCVA was 0.28 logMAR -/+ 0.24 SD and the mean BCVA was 0.01 logMAR -/+ 0.03 SD, with a mean MRSE of -0.07 D -/+ 1.00 SD. In both groups, no complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: After a long follow-up period, both topographically guided two-step LASIK and standard LASIK could be considered effective and safe tools in the correction of refractive errors after successful PKP for keratoconus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spadea et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: