Why the study?
The relationship between ST-segment resolution and myocardial scar thickness after PCI in patients with STEMI needed to be investigated.
Does ST-segment resolution < 40.15% at 24 h after PCI predict transmural myocardial scar in STEMI patients?
Does ST-segment resolution < 40.15% at 24 h after PCI predict transmural myocardial scar in STEMI patients?
ST-segment resolution < 40.15% at 24 hours post-PCI is a strong, accessible predictor of transmural myocardial scar in STEMI patients, offering a practical alternative to CMR-LGE.
Objective: To investigate the relationship between ST-segment resolution (STR) and myocardial scar thickness after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: Forty-two STEMI patients with single-branch coronary artery stenosis or occlusion were enrolled. ST-segment elevations were measured at emergency admission and at 24 h after PCI. Late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR-LGE) was performed 7 days after PCI to evaluate myocardial scars. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the utility of STR to predict the development of transmural (>75%) or non-transmural (<75%) myocardial scars. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of STR for predicting transmural scars were 96% and 88%, respectively, at an STR cut-off value of 40.15%. The area under the curve was 0.92. Multivariate logistic proportional hazards regression analysis disclosed that patients with STR<40.15% had a 112.95-fold higher probability of developing transmural scars compared with patients with STR≥40.15%. STR percentage was negatively correlated with myocardial scar thickness (β=-0.838, P <0.001) and size (β=-0.714, P <0.001). Conclusion: STR<40.15% at 24 h after PCI may provide meaningful diagnostic nformation regarding the extent of myocardial scarification in STEMI patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: