OBJECTIVE: To investigate, in patients with Parkinson disease, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of levodopa/carbidopa delivered via 3 different extended-release (ER) tablet formulations. METHODS: This was a randomized, crossover study in patients with stable idiopathic Parkinson disease comparing a conventional ER tablet (C-ER) administered orally 3 times daily with 2 levodopa/carbidopa gastroretentive ER formulations administered orally twice daily, one with an immediate release (IR) component (IR/ER) and one without (ER). Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis, and a finger-tapping test was performed to assess pharmacodynamics. Tolerability was evaluated by monitoring adverse events and measuring vital signs. PK modeling was performed to estimate steady-state levodopa concentrations. RESULTS: Fourteen patients completed the study. Compared with C-ER, both gastroretentive ER tablets significantly extended the first maximum time (6.0 vs 2.5 h; P < 0.025) and had smoother plasma concentration-time profiles while achieving a similar maximum plasma concentration and area under the curve. The IR/ER formulation exhibited a significantly longer duration of concentration above the presumed efficacious threshold of 300 ng/mL (21 vs 18 h; P = 0.0027) compared with C-ER. PK modeling predicts a steady-state levodopa peak/trough ratio of 4 for both IR/ER and ER formulations and a ratio of 21 for C-ER. Furthermore, superior response in the finger tapping test was observed for the IR/ER and ER formulations compared with the C-ER formulation. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the gastroretentive ER formulations achieved more constant plasma levodopa concentrations and better pharmacodynamics with reduced dose frequency, potentially reducing the on-off phenomena that have been associated with fluctuations in plasma levodopa concentrations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: