Why the study?
Most testing protocols to assess swimmers' physiological training status are invasive, time-consuming, costly, and have practical constraints.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May caution against short tests for critical velocity in swimmers; leaves open standardized aerobic protocols for training validation.
Swimming is a human activity that relies heavily on individual physiological capabilities. In fact, the swimming general performance equation, proposed several years ago by di Prampero *1+, highlighted the energy expenditure, the propulsive efficiency and the hydrodynamic drag as its main determinants. Therefore, coaches and exercise physiologists have been proposing a number of testing protocols aiming to diagnose the swimmers physiological training status. However, most of these protocols are invasive, time consuming and costly (e.g. the oxygen uptake assessment and the blood lactate concentrations determination). In addition, some of these tests have some constraints, as the use of a cumbersome breathing valve for respiratory data collection(cf. *2+) and the selection of an averaged value of blood lactate concentrations as an non individualized index oendurance performance *3,4+.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fernandes et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: