To determine whether the steroid antagonist RU486 mediates its antiglucocorticoid and antiprogestin activities by the same or different receptor mechanisms, a direct comparison of RU486 interaction with glucocorticoid (GR) and progesterone (PR) receptors was made. The effects of RU486 on transformation of GR and PR 8-10S complexes in the intact cell and in vitro were analyzed by sucrose density gradient centrifugation, and the in vitro stability of receptor-heat shock protein-90 interactions was analyzed by coimmunoprecipitation. Compared to agonist, RU486 binding produced a reduction in the amount of GR converted from 8S to 4S and stabilized the GR-heat shock protein-90 complex. By contrast, PR-RU486 complexes were transformed both in vitro and in the intact cell to the same extent as receptor-agonist complexes. PR-RU486 complexes sedimented at 5-6S, whereas PR-R5020, GR-RU486, and GR-agonist complexes sedimented at 4S. The portion of GR that undergoes nuclear transformation when bound to RU486 was examined for binding to the glucocorticoid-progesterone response element of the mouse mammary tumor virus by an immunoprecipitation assay. The nuclear-transformed GR-RU486 complex bound the glucocorticoid-progesterone response element with the same affinity as the nuclear-transformed GR-triamcinolone acetonide complex. The electrophoretic mobilities of GR-RU486 complexes and GR-agonist complexes were the same, as determined by gel retardation assay. These results suggest that RU486 exerts its antiglucocorticoid activity at two levels of receptor action: prevention of complete GR transformation and alteration of a step subsequent to GR-DNA binding. As an antiprogestin, RU486 action is exerted predominantly at a post-DNA-binding step.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beck et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: