Why the study?
Recent European Society of Cardiology recommendations on cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus provided few comments about when and how to recommend cardiovascular imaging.
Does cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging improve the evaluation and risk stratification of cardiovascular involvement in patients with diabetes mellitus?
Does cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging improve the evaluation and risk stratification of cardiovascular involvement in patients with diabetes mellitus?
CMR provides comprehensive assessment of tissue characterization, perfusion, and function without radiation, playing a key role in the risk stratification of high-risk diabetes patients.
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a new epidemic which has presented an immense increase in recent decades, due to the rapid increase in obesity. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) significantly reduces life expectancy and is the main cause of death in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Strict glycemic control is a well-established method to combat microvascular CVD of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM); its role against CVD of the T2DM risk has not been well documented. Therefore, the most efficient prevention is multifactorial risk factor reduction. Recently, the European Society of Cardiology published its 2019 recommendations on CVD in DM. Although all clinical points were discussed in this document, only a few comments were presented about when and how we should recommend cardiovascular (CV) imaging. Currently, CV imaging is the “must” in CV noninvasive evaluation. Alterations in CV imaging parameters can lead to early recognition of various types of CVD. In this paper, we briefly discuss the role of noninvasive imaging modalities, emphasizing the benefits of including cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in the evaluation of DM. CMR, in the same examination, can provide an assessment of tissue characterization, perfusion and function, with excellent reproducibility and without radiation or limitations, due to the body habitus. Therefore, it can play a dominant role in the prevention and risk stratification of DM. The suggested protocol for DM evaluation should include routine annual echocardiographic evaluation of all DM patients and CMR assessment of those with poorly controlled DM, microalbuminuria, heart failure, arrhythmia and recent alterations in clinical or echocardiographic evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mavrogeni et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: