Why the study?
T2DM is associated with worsened clinical outcomes in HCM patients, but whether HCM patients with T2DM exhibit adverse cardiac alterations in myocardial energetics, function, perfusion, or tissue characteristics was unknown.
Does coexistent Type 2 diabetes mellitus worsen myocardial energetics, perfusion, and tissue characteristics in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Does coexistent Type 2 diabetes mellitus worsen myocardial energetics, perfusion, and tissue characteristics in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Coexistent type 2 diabetes in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is associated with greater reductions in myocardial energetics and perfusion, and higher myocardial scar burden.
Coexistent diabetes may worsen energetics and perfusion in HCM; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
OBJECTIVE: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with worsened clinical outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients. We sought to investigate whether HCM patients with T2DM comorbidity exhibit adverse cardiac alterations in myocardial energetics, function, perfusion, or tissue characteristics. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 55 participants with concomitant HCM and T2DM (HCM-DM) (n = 20) or isolated HCM (n = 20) and healthy volunteers (HV) (n = 15) underwent 31P-MRS and cardiovascular MRI. The HCM groups were matched for HCM phenotype. RESULTS: Mean ± SD European Society of Cardiology sudden cardiac death risk scores were comparable between the HCM groups (HCM 2.2 ± 1.5%, HCM-DM 1.9 ± 1.2%; P = not significant), and sarcomeric mutations were equally common. HCM-DM patients had the highest median NT-proBNP levels (HV 42 ng/L [interquartile range 35-66], HCM 298 ng/L [157-837], HCM-DM 726 ng/L [213-8,695]; P < 0.0001). Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, mass, and wall thickness were similar between the HCM groups. HCM-DM patients displayed a greater degree of fibrosis burden with higher scar percentage and lower global longitudinal strain compared with HCM patients. PCr/ATP (the relative concentrations of phosphocreatine and ATP) was significantly lower in the HCM-DM group than in both HCM and HV (HV 2.17 ± 0.49, HCM 1.93 ± 0.38, HCM-DM 1.54 ± 0.27; P = 0.002). In a similar pattern, stress myocardial blood flow was significantly lower in the HCM-DM group than in both HCM and HV (HV 2.06 ± 0.42 mL/min/g, HCM 1.74 ± 0.44 mL/min/g, HCM-DM 1.39 ± 0.42 mL/min/g; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: We show for the first time that HCM-DM patients display greater reductions in myocardial energetics, perfusion, and contractile function and higher myocardial scar burden and serum NT-proBNP levels compared with patients with isolated HCM despite similar LV mass and wall thickness and presence of sarcomeric mutations. These adverse phenotypic features may be important components of the adverse clinical manifestation attributable to a combined presence of HCM and T2DM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jex et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: