Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study finds comparable bleeding rates with continued antithrombotics during transrectal prostate biopsy, suggesting routine cessation may be unnecessary.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between antithrombotic continuation and the frequency and severity of bleeding events during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study involved 1248 patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy between April 2018 and December 2024. Patients were grouped into antithrombotic(+) (continued therapy) or antithrombotic(-) (no therapy). The groups were matched 1:1 using propensity scores based on patient demographics. RESULTS: Propensity score matching yielded 162 patients per group. Mild and severe hematuria rates were comparable between the antithrombotic(+) and antithrombotic(-) groups (80.9% and 1.9% vs. 72.8% and 2.5%), with overall rectal bleeding occurring in 29.6% and 29.0%, respectively. Hematospermia rates did not differ significantly. In the unmatched direct-acting oral anticoagulant cohort, severe rectal bleeding occurred in three patients (5.7%). Multivariate analysis identified diabetes mellitus (odds ratio, 3.47, 95% confidence interval, 1.10-10.96; p = 0.034) and biopsy core number (odds ratio, 0.39, 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.74; p = 0.004) as independent predictors of severe bleeding events. CONCLUSIONS: Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy was generally safe without antithrombotic discontinuation, with no significant increase in bleeding events. Caution is warranted when continuing direct-acting oral anticoagulants, particularly in patients with risk factors for bleeding, such as diabetes mellitus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hata et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: