Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aim . To evaluate the long-term results of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. To perform an analysis of risk factors for tumor recurrence. Materials and methods . A retrospective analysis of 63 deceased donor liver transplantations, which were performed from January 2010 to February 2020. Patients were divided into three groups according to the Milan and California criteria – within the Milan criteria, outside the Milan criteria, but within the California criteria, outside the California criteria. Results . There were 33 recipients within the Milan criteria, 5 within the California criteria, and 25 outside the California criteria. The 5-years recurrence rate was 9.1%, 40% and 52%, respectively (p = 0.002), five-year survival rate of – 93.2%, 66.7% and 54.7% (p = 0.041). Factors associated with an increased risk of recurrence: five and more tumor nodes (OR = 3.675; 95% CI (1.35–9.97); p = 0.011), macroscopic vascular invasion (OR = 5.97; 95% CI (2.06–17.31); p = 0.001) and inconsistency with California criteria (OR = 4.00; 95% CI (1.49–10.74); p = 0.006). The factors associated with a lower recurrence rate: one or two tumor nodes (p = 0.014 and 0.042, respectively), a high grade of histological differentiation (RR = 0.24; 95% CI (0.06–0.93); p = 0.039), compliance with Milanese criteria (RR = 0.18; 95% CI (0.06–0.58); p = 0.004). Conclusion . Liver transplantation can be performed in a number of patients beyond the Milan and California criteria. The morphological and biological characteristics of the tumor and a multidisciplinary differentiated approach to treatment have an important role in the success of treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gautier et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: