Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In contrast to HLA-B*2705, B*2709 is weakly or not associated to ankylosing spondylitis. Both allotypes differ by a single D116H change. We compared the B*2705- and B*2709-bound peptide repertoires by mass spectrometry to quantify the effect of B*2709 polymorphism on peptide specificity. In addition, shared and differentially bound ligands were sequenced to define the structural features of the various peptide subsets. B*2705 shared 79% of its peptide repertoire with B*2709. Shared ligands accounted for 88% of the B*2709-bound repertoire. All B*2705 ligands not bound to B*2709 had C-terminal basic or Tyr residues. Most B*2709-bound peptides had C-terminal aliphatic and Phe residues, but two showed C-terminal Arg or Tyr. The B*2709-bound repertoire included 12% of peptides not found in B*2705. These had aliphatic C-terminal residues, which are also favored in B*2705. However, these peptides bound weakly B*2705 in vitro, indicating distinct contribution of secondary anchor residues in both subtypes. Differences in peptide binding did not affect the ratio of native to beta2-microglobulin-free HLA-B27 heavy chain at the cell surface. Our results suggest that weaker association of B*2709 with ankylosing spondylitis is based on differential binding of a limited subset of natural ligands by this allotype.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramos et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: