Summary Purpose The present study aimed to compare the results of the Schirmer test over time between the eyes of healthy participants and those with aqueous-deficient dry eye (ADDE) and to calculate the diagnostic cut-off values. Methods An observational cross-sectional study was carried out with 20 healthy volunteers and 20 patients with ADDE who fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria (40 eyes/group). A digital photograph was taken of each strip in both eyes simultaneously every minute during a Schirmer test procedure until the test ended (minutes 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5). Results from the strips were measured by a masked observer using ImageJ software and compared between the two groups. Results There was a difference in the Schirmer test results for the various time points in all analyses between the two groups (Greenhouse–Geisser, both p ≤ 0.001; Sidak, all p ≤ 0.001). In the pairwise analysis of each time point, there was a difference in Schirmer values between the groups (unpaired t test, all p ≤ 0.001). There was no inter-eye difference in Schirmer absolute values between time points for both groups (Friedman, both p ≥ 0.090; Wilcoxon, all p ≥ 0.062), except for the first vs. the fourth and fifth time points in the ADDE participants (Wilcoxon, both p ≤ 0.030). In the pairwise analysis of each time point, there was a difference in inter-eye absolute values between the groups (unpaired t test, all p ≤ 0.010), except for the fourth vs. the final time point (Mann–Whitney, both p ≥ 0.414). Conclusion A complete report of the progression of Schirmer test values over time and between the eyes of healthy participants and ADDE patients is presented here, along with the cut-off criteria for the different time points studied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pena‐Verdeal et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: