Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SUMMARY Norway spruce and red oak trees were planted directly into the soil and exposed to 700 μmol mol ‐1 CO 2 in open‐top chambers. There were large inter‐specific differences in response to naturally occurring drought during the second year of exposure to elevated CO 2 . Both species had decreased assimilation rates. CO 2 ‐treated red oak had no loss of photosynthetic enhancement when undroughted, whereas CO 2 ‐treated Norway spruce showed a relative increase in assimilation rates only when draughted. The effect of CO 2 on radial growth of both species was less marked in the second growing season, but this may have been a result of different biomass partitioning as Norway spruce shoot extension had a different pattern of growth in elevated CO 2 . Stomatal density and chlorophyll content were largely unaffected by the CO 2 treatment. A precise method for measuring Norway spruce needle surface area was also developed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dixon et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: