Why the study?
Does the Samba fiber-optic pressure recording system prevent mean aortic pressure drop compared to a 1.4-Fr Millar catheter when assessing hemodynamic variables in mice?
Does the Samba fiber-optic pressure recording system prevent mean aortic pressure drop compared to a 1.4-Fr Millar catheter when assessing hemodynamic variables in mice?
The Samba fiber-optic pressure recording system provides accurate hemodynamic measurements in mice without causing the significant drop in mean aortic pressure seen with standard Millar catheters.
We have tested a new fiber-optic pressure recording system, Samba, with a thin fiber [outer diameter (OD) = 0.25 mm] and a pressure sensor (length and OD = 0.42 mm) attached to the end. The accuracy of the system tested in vitro was good, with a coefficient of variation of 2.54% at 100 mmHg. The drift was <0.45 mmHg/h, and the temperature sensitivity was approximately 0.07 mmHg/1 degrees C between 22 and 37 degrees C. The frequency response characteristics were similar to a 1.4-Fr Millar catheter (0-200 Hz). Introduction of the Samba sensor from the right carotid artery into the left ventricle in six mice caused no drop in mean aortic pressure, whereas introduction of a 1.4-Fr Millar catheter (OD = 0.47 mm; n = 6) caused a pressure drop from 91.6 +/- 9.2 to 65.1 +/- 6.2 mmHg; P < 0.05. Thus the Samba sensor system may represent a new alternative to assess hemodynamic variables in the murine cardiovascular system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Woldbæk et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: