This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Mosquito-borne virus surveillance increasingly requires rapid, distributed detection of co-circulating pathogens, serotypes, and lineages across clinical and vector-sampling sites. CRISPR-Cas platforms offer a programmable toolkit for this purpose, but their readiness differs substantially across surveillance functions. Here, we review CRISPR-Cas methods for mosquito-borne virus surveillance across detection, tracing, and discovery-supporting targeted screening. Detection is the most advanced application: selected Cas12- and Cas13-based assays for dengue, Zika, chikungunya, West Nile, Japanese encephalitis, and related mosquito-associated viruses report sub-hour workflows, portable readouts, and targeted serotype- or lineage-marker discrimination. However, performance remains assay-, target-, and sample-matrix-dependent, and validation in pooled mosquito samples and field settings is still limited. Tracing currently relies mainly on validated portable amplicon-sequencing workflows, whereas CRISPR-aided sample-preparation methods such as DASH, FLASH, RAPID-DASH, and Cas9-targeted enrichment remain transferable opportunities for host depletion or target enrichment rather than established mosquito-borne virus genomic-surveillance workflows. For discovery-oriented surveillance, multiplex CRISPR-Cas systems such as CARMEN can support targeted screening of known or near-neighbor viruses represented by predesigned crRNAs, while metagenomic next-generation sequencing remains necessary for divergent or previously unknown viruses. Across these functions, CRISPR-Cas programmability may accelerate parts of assay redesign, but practical retargeting still requires compatible amplification primers, effector-specific target constraints, cross-reactivity assessment, and analytical revalidation. Routine surveillance use will require integrated demonstrations with clinical and pooled-vector samples, comparison against established molecular and sequencing methods, cost validation, and regulatory evidence.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: