Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compared to two-view reconstruction, multi-view imagery leverages redundant information to mitigate the effects of occlusion and noise. Deep learning-based multi-view stereo (MVS) methods are primarily applicable to tri-stereo data captured simultaneously and rely heavily on training samples. Traditional MVS methods typically rely on simple filtering and weighting techniques for DSM fusion based on image pair selection and pair-wise stereo matching, which are usually affected by poor image pairs and fail to fully exploit the complementary advantages of DSMs. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a novel DSM fusion method incorporating learning-based dual-scale enhanced confidence for 3D reconstruction from multi-view satellite imagery. First, a generalized stereo matching method is adopted, which considers radiometric differences and small feature variations. Next, auxiliary information generated during pair-wise stereo reconstruction is utilized to construct a high-dimensional confidence vector that includes classical confidence measures and a newly designed topological structure relationship consistency (TSRC) measure. Then, a guided regularized random forest regressor is employed to identify influential confidence measures and establish their correlation with reconstruction accuracy, leading to the estimation of enhanced confidence. Additionally, to preserve fine details and boundary information, the dual-scale enhanced confidence is introduced to facilitate cross-scale DSM fusion. Finally, each view is sequentially treated as the master view to obtain DSMs, which are then fused to produce the final DSM. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves superior performance across various datasets, including tri-stereo Beijing-3 data acquired nearly simultaneously, multi-view WorldView-3 data captured at different times, and self-made tri-stereo data collected from different sensors at different times. The proposed method achieves an average MAE of 1.14 m, RMSE of 2.16 m, MHE of 0.47 m, and COMP of 75.13%, outperforming several mainstream methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: