Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Epitaxial SrTiO3 (STO) films were fabricated on CeO2/yttria-stabilized zirconia(YSZ)/Si(001) substrates by the insertion of a TiO2 atomic layer by pulsed-laser deposition. X-ray diffraction and reflection high-energy electron diffraction showed that epitaxial STO films with different out-of-plane orientations have been obtained by controlling the thickness of the TiO2 atomic layer. A stoichiometric STO film directly deposited on CeO2/YSZ/Si was preferentially (110) oriented with a STO[1̄10]∥CeO2[100] epitaxial relationship. On the other hand, 1 monolayer (ML) TiO2-covered CeO2/YSZ/Si resulted in STO(001) film epitaxially growth with a STO[110]∥CeO2[100] relationship. However, as the TiO2 thickness exceeded 1 ML, the orientation of STO film drastically changed to (111) orientation having a STO[011̄]∥CeO2[100] epitaxial relationship. These results indicate that the atomic layer thickness dramatically controls the film epitaxial growth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamada et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: