[O]ur interest lies in exploring whether surrogate decision makers assess accurately their spouses' quality of life represent accurately preferences regarding the use of life-sustaining treatments. Our in quality of life rests on several considerations relevant to decision making....We hypothesize that a spouse's concordant of a patient's self-report of quality of life corresponds to an of the patient's values and preferences with regard to-sustaining treatment. We assume that quality of life is a major in deliberations over whether a life is worth prolonging when a life-threatening event. If our hypothesis is supported, this some doubt on the need for the clear and convincing evidentiary standard in the
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pearlman et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: