Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Schiff base ligands [3,5-But2-2-(OH)C6H2CHNL] [L = CH2CH2NMe2 (1a), 2-(PhO)C6H4 (1b), 2-CH2C5H3N (1c), 8-C9H6N (quinoline) (1d) and 2-(PPh2)C6H4 (1e)] are accessed in good yields (>85%) via standard imine condensation reactions. Reaction of 1a–e with Me3Al at room temperature affords the corresponding complexes [(3,5-But2-2-(O)C6H2CHNL)AlMe2] (2a–e); in the case of L = 8-quinoline, the same reaction conducted in refluxing toluene affords binuclear {[3,5-But2-2-(O)C6H2CHMeN-8-C9H6N]AlMe}2 (3) by methyl migration from metal to ligand. Further reaction of the dimethyl compounds with B(C6F5)3 in CD2Cl2 or C6D6 affords the cationic systems [(3,5-But2-2-(O)C6H2CHNL)AlMe]+ (4a–e). The crystal structures of 2a, 2c, 2e and 3 have been determined. In 2a and 2c the respective ligands bind to the metal centre via all three heteroatoms, the aluminium having a trigonal bipyramidal geometry, whereas in 2e coordination is via nitrogen and oxygen only, and the aluminium is tetrahedral. Complex 3 has a dimeric structure with the ligand adopting both tridentate and binucleating roles; the aluminium centres are trigonal bipyramidal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cameron et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: