Why the study?
Does a hostility-reduction intervention reduce hostility and resting blood pressure in high-hostile men with coronary heart disease?
Does a hostility-reduction intervention reduce hostility and resting blood pressure in high-hostile men with coronary heart disease?
A hostility-reduction intervention may effectively reduce hostility and diastolic blood pressure in men with coronary heart disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports hostility-reduction in high-hostile CHD men; extends psychosocial intervention evidence to diastolic BP control.
This preliminary study examined the effects of a hostility-reduction intervention on patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Twenty-two high-hostile CHD men were matched on age and hostility and then randomly assigned to a hostility intervention (N = 10) or an information-control group (N = 12). Patients were reassessed immediately and 2 months posttreatment on hostility (with self-report and structured interview) and resting blood pressure. The intervention's overall effect size was moderately strong (d' = .62). Intervention patients reported at both reassessments and were observed at follow-up to be less hostile than controls. At follow-up, intervention patients had significantly lower diastolic blood pressure (DBP) than controls. Finally, reductions in hostility were significantly and positively correlated with reductions in DBP. Replication with a larger sample and CHD outcomes is recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gidron et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: