The responses of the three peptides, endothelin 1 (ET-1), endothelin 2 (ET-2) and endothelin 3 (ET-3) were analysed on isolated circular segments of pulmonary arteries and trachea from the guinea-pig. 2. In the pulmonary artery, the vasomotor responses to the endothelins, expressed as the maximum contraction (Emax%), had the order ET-1 greater than ET-2 greater than ET-3 while the order of potency (pD2) was ET-1 = ET-2 greater than ET-3. ET-1 and ET-2 caused cross-desensitization, but did not affect the responses to ET-3. ET-3 did not cause cross-desensitization to ET-1 or ET-2 although it induced homologous desensitization. Finally, the effects of ET-1 and ET-2 were additive to those of ET-3. The additive effect of ET-3 to those of ET-1 or ET-2 was more difficult to demonstrate, given the profound contraction produced by ET-1 and to a lesser extent by ET-2. 3. In the trachea, the rank order of potency, additivity and desensitization were different from the pulmonary artery. Basically, all three peptides were equipotent but less potent than ET-1 in the artery. There was no evidence for additivity and only a slight tendency to tachyphylaxis was seen. 4. The guinea-pig pulmonary artery appears to be endowed with one receptor type which is sensitive to ET-1/ET-2 and with another receptor type which responds preferentially to ET-3. In the trachea, neither of these receptors appears to be present since all three peptides apparently act on a homogeneous population of receptors with characteristics different from those of the two arterial receptors. This suggests a third non-isopeptide selective type of endothelin receptor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cardell et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: