Why the study?
Do trimethoprim-sulfadiazine and detomidine affect the function of equine Kv11.1 channels in a Xenopus oocyte model?
Do trimethoprim-sulfadiazine and detomidine affect the function of equine Kv11.1 channels in a Xenopus oocyte model?
Trimethoprim blocks equine Kv11.1 channels in an oocyte model, suggesting a potential risk for drug-induced long QT syndrome in horses.
May warrant QT prolongation caution with trimethoprim in horses; hypothesis-generating, requiring in vivo confirmation.
The long QT syndrome ( LQTS ) is a channelopathy that can lead to severe arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. Pharmacologically induced LQTS is caused by interaction between drugs and potassium channels, especially the K v 11.1 channel. Due to such interactions, numerous drugs have been withdrawn from the market or are administered with precautions in human medicine. However, some compounds, such as trimethoprim–sulfonamide combinations are still widely used in veterinarian medicine. Therefore, we investigate the effect of trimethoprim–sulfadiazine ( TMS ), trimethoprim, sulfadiazine, and detomidine on equine‐specific K v 11.1 channels. K v 11.1 channels cloned from equine hearts were heterologously expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes, and whole cell currents were measured by two‐electrode voltage‐clamp before and after drug application. TMS blocked equine K v 11.1 current with an IC 50 of 3.74 m m (95% CI: 2.95–4.73 m m ) and affected the kinetics of activation and inactivation. Similar was found for trimethoprim but not for sulfadiazine, suggesting the effect is due to trimethoprim. Detomidine did not affect equine K v 11.1 current. Thus, equine K v 11.1 channels are also susceptible to pharmacological block, indicating that some drugs may have the potential to affect repolarization in horse. However, in vivo studies are needed to assess the potential risk of these drugs to induce equine LQTS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trachsel et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: