We prospectively studied 64 male veteran out-patients with psychotic illnesses receiving one of six antipsychotic agents grouped by potency (low, mid, high, atypical) to determine: (1) prevalence of side effects; (2) cumulative side effect burden; and (3) relationship between side effects and patient-perceived burden. Patients were administered a questionnaire which included: (1) demographic information; (2) prevalence of 49 side effects; (3) visual analog scales (VAS) rating the severity of 10 selected side effects; and (4) overall side effect burden scale. Outcome measures included comparison of the prevalence, severity and overall burden of side effects among the potency groups (Part A); and association between side effect prevalence and burden, the correlation between severity and burden of certain side effects and demographic variables for the entire population (Part B). In Part A some unexpected similarities and differences were seen among data collected; few significant differences were found between groups. In Part B, 11 of 49 side effects (22%) were significantly associated with burden; the severity of 9 of 10 side effects (90%) and two demographic variables were significantly correlated with burden. These findings suggest that the prevalence and severity of many side effects of antipsychotic agents may affect a patient's perception of side effect-related burden. The side effect burden ratings suggest that the low-potency agents were the most burdensome, while the atypical group was the least burdensome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhavnani et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: