Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Variant forms of apolipoprotein A-I (apo-A-I) have been shown to exist in the human population. One mutant form, referred to as apo-A-I-Münster-3, is one charge unit more basic than normal apo-A-I on isoelectric focusing gels. This variant has the same immunologic characteristics and molecular weight as normal apo-A-I. The apo-A-I-Münster-3 from subjects in three unrelated families (in two of which the trait has been shown to be transmitted as an autosomal co-dominant) has been analyzed by partial amino acid sequencing to define the cause of the electrophoretic abnormality. In the apo-A-I of family A, the abnormality was shown to occur in the smallest cyanogen bromide fragment, CB-2 (residues 87-112), and amino acid sequencing revealed asparagine instead of the usual aspartic acid at residue 103. Subjects with this mutant form have shown no signs of dyslipoproteinemia. The NH2-terminal cyanogen bromide fragment (CB-1, residues 1-86) from the apo-A-I of family B was shown to differ electrophoretically from normal CB-1, and amino acid sequencing revealed that a substitution of arginine for proline at residue 4 was responsible for this variant form. Analysis of the plasma lipids of one affected family B member demonstrated that the percentage of the total cholesterol that was esterified was somewhat lower than that normally observed. In a third family, family C, a variant having the same electrophoretic abnormality as the other two was determined to have an amino acid substitution at yet a different position. In this variant, histidine was found at residue 3 in the apo-A-I sequence, rather than the usual proline. In all three cases, the substitution could account for the electrophoretic abnormality. It is proposed that these three apo-A-I-Münster-3 variants be designated apo-A-I(Asp103----Asn), apo-A-I(Pro4----Arg), and apo-A-I(Pro3----His), respectively, to indicate the substitution that accounts for the abnormality in isoelectric focusing gels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Menzel et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: