In Brief Objective: To determine the effect of fascial posterior colpoperineorrhaphy on bowel and sexual function. Methods: A retrospective observational study of women undergoing fascial colpoperineorrhaphy over a five-year period in a tertiary referral urogynecology unit. At follow up all women completed structured questionnaires and 34 (57%) of the women returned for clinical examination. Results: 80 women were identified who had undergone posterior colpoperineorrhaphy alone of whom 60 (75%) were available for analysis. Mean age was 55.8 years (range 32–86) and mean duration of follow up was 41 months (range 19–77). 34 women (57%) returned and were examined. Postoperatively prolapse symptoms due to rectocele decreased (88% versus 32%). Symptoms of vaginal pain (38% versus 17%), dyspareunia (33% versus 10%) vaginal laxity (25% versus 8%) and digitation to defecate (30% versus 10%) were all significantly reduced. However there was no significant difference in sexual activity (57% versus 45%), constipation (40% versus 37%), faecal incontinence (20% versus 17%) or troublesome lower urinary tract symptoms (52% versus 38%). Conclusion: Successful correction of posterior vaginal wall prolapse is possible using a fascial posterior colpoperineorrhaphy, leading to a significant improvement in symptoms of prolapse and dyspareunia without any deterioration in bowel or bladder function, suggesting that this technique may be superior to a standard conventional posterior vaginal wall repair. Successful correction of posterior vaginal wall prolapse is possible using a fascial posterior colpoperineorrhaphy, leading to a significant improvement in symptoms of prolapse and dyspareunia without any deterioration in bowel or bladder function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robinson et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: