This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
OBJECTIVE: Following the first French multicenter pilot study (AnDDI-Prenatome) focused on the implementation of prenatal exome sequencing (pES), this ancillary study aims to explore the ethical and clinical issues raised by pES within multidisciplinary prenatal diagnosis centers. METHODS: 33 healthcare professionals involved in the management of couples undergoing prenatal diagnosis (PND) took part in focus groups (2 with clinical geneticists, 3 with professionals from multidisciplinary prenatal diagnosis centers (MPDC), 1 with biologists). Each focus group was analyzed using the thematic analysis method. RESULTS: Professionals emphasized the importance of having a clear understanding of pES and the criteria for its prescription. Geneticists highlighted the need for a framework to clarify the implications of consent for patients and stressed the importance of offering structured support to assist couples in their decision-making process. Biologists and geneticists expressed a desire for effective multidisciplinary coordination of the care pathway, particularly in situations where the results were uncertain. CONCLUSION: These results will help to establish French recommendations for the prescription of pES.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meunier‐Beillard et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: