Audit findings relating to the suitability of equipment installed in 17 specially designed community houses for adults with learning disabilities, revealed that equipment designed to enable maximum engagement in domestic tasks was not being used by the individuals for whom it was provided. This article explores the possible reasons for the non-use of this equipment in the light of current literature. Equipment design, client ability, support staff involvement and occupational therapy principles and practice are identified as primary contributory factors. Suggestions for improving ‘equipment fit’ to this client group are made.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rebecca Pockney (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: