Why the study?
The contribution of risk factors to in-stent restenosis in ACS is not clearly defined, prompting the use of machine learning to better identify independent predictors.
Can machine learning models accurately predict the risk of in-stent restenosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI?
Can machine learning models accurately predict the risk of in-stent restenosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI?
Machine learning models, particularly Random Forest, can predict the risk of in-stent restenosis in ACS patients post-PCI with moderate accuracy based on clinical and angiographic features.
Background: In acute coronary syndrome (ACS), a number of previous studies tried to identify the risk factors that are most likely to influence the rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR), but the contribution of these factors to ISR is not clearly defined. Thus, the need for a better way of identifying the independent predictors of ISR, which comes in the form of Machine Learning (ML). Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between ISR and risk factors associated with ACS and to develop and validate a nomogram to predict the probability of ISR through the use of ML in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: Consecutive patients presenting with ACS who were successfully treated with PCI and who had an angiographic follow-up after at least 3 months were included in the study. ISR risk factors considered into the study were demographic, clinical and peri-procedural angiographic lesion risk factors. We explored four ML techniques (Random Forest (RF), support vector machines (SVM), simple linear logistic regression (LLR) and deep neural network (DNN)) to predict the risk of ISR. Overall, 21 features were selected as input variables for the ML algorithms, including continuous, categorical and binary variables. Results: = 87). The most performant model in terms of ISR prediction out of the four explored was RF, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.726. Across the predictors herein considered, only three predictors were statistically significant, precisely, the number of affected arteries (≥2), stent generation and diameter. Conclusion: ML models applied in patients after PCI can contribute to a better differentiation of the future risk of ISR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scafa‐Udriște et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: