Why the study?
An increasing number of patients undergoing PVI are obese, but data on outcomes of cryoballoon versus radiofrequency PVI in relation to body mass index remain scarce.
Does cryoballoon ablation compared to radiofrequency ablation improve procedural outcomes and reduce AF recurrence in obese patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation?
Does cryoballoon ablation compared to radiofrequency ablation improve procedural outcomes and reduce AF recurrence in obese patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation?
In obese patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation, cryoballoon ablation is as safe and effective as radiofrequency ablation, offering shorter procedure times but requiring more contrast and fluoroscopy.
PURPOSE: Cryoballoon (CB) ablation and radiofrequency (RF) ablation are the most common techniques for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). An increasing number of patients undergoing PVI are obese. To address the paucity of data on outcomes of CB- vs. RF-based PVI in relation to body mass index (BMI) of AF patients. METHODS: All patients undergoing de novo PVI between 01/2018 and 08/2019 at University Hospital Cologne were included in this retrospective analysis. Patients of each group (CB-PVI vs. RF-PVI) were analyzed based on their BMI. Hereafter, procedural characteristics and AF recurrence rate were compared regarding different BMI groups. RESULTS: A total of 526 patients (62% male, 65±11 years) underwent successful de novo PVI (320 CB and 206 RF). In obese patients, two differences in procedural characteristics were noted: A significantly increased contrast medium volume in CB group and a lower fluoroscopy dose in RF group: contrast medium: CB 50 [40-80] vs. RF 20 [20-30], p<0.001; fluoroscopy dose: CB 392.4 [197.9-995.9] vs. RF 282.5 [139.8-507.2], p<0.001. The complication rate was equal throughout all BMI groups, regardless of CB or RF usage. For obese patients, a trend toward a higher AF recurrence rate was revealed after RF-PVI as compared to CB-PVI. In line with previous studies, the overall procedure time was significantly shorter with CB-PVI regardless of BMI. CONCLUSION: For obese patients, CB-PVI is similarly safe and effective as RF-PVI. The significantly shorter procedure time for CB-PVI may minimize potential obesity-related complications. However, the lower contrast medium quantity and fluoroscopy dose in RF-PVI must be considered. AF recurrence rates were comparable between CB-PVI and RF-PVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scheurlen et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: