Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study assessed how discrimination and antihomeless ordinances contribute to exclusion, and the meanings and functions of “safe space” among 25 women and men associated with a farming training site who were currently or formerly unhoused. Respondents reported widespread exclusion and interpersonal and institutional discrimination, with the farm identified as a “safe space” from the pervasive stigmatization and surveillance that characterized interactions in the broader community. However, in constructing the farm as a “safe space,” some respondents distanced themselves from unhoused people who were unaffiliated with the farm. Implications for reducing exclusion and fostering “safe spaces” among people experiencing homelessness are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bullock et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: