Passive lung anaphylaxis (PLA) was investigated in rats sensitized by the intravenous injection of high titre reaginic antiserum prepared in rats. 2 The effect of various pharmacological antagonists on anaphylactic bronchoconstriction in vivo were examined. An antihistamine (mepyramine), a kallikrein inactivator (aprotinin) or a prostaglandin synthesis inhibitor (aspirin) did not inhibit PLA, whereas an anti-5-hydroxytryptamine agent (methysergide) and an anti-slow reacting substance-A agent (FPL 55712) significantly reduced the response. 3 Isolated perfused lungs taken from sensitized rats released, on challenge with the sensitizing antigen, histamine, 5-hydroxytryptamine, slow reacting substance of anaphylaxis (SRS-A) and prostaglandins, but no rabbit aorta contracting substance (RCS). 4 Disodium cromoglycate inhibited both anaphylactic bronchoconstriction in vivo and the anaphylactic release of mediators in vitro. Inhibition in vivo was dose-related. 5 Mediators from the intestine, the primary shock organ of anaphylaxis in the rat, did not contribute to the lung response. 6 Vagal reflex pathways were found not to be important in PLA in vivo. 7 The relationship between the mediators released following antigen challenge of passively sensitized rat lung in vitro and passive lung anaphylaxis in vivo is discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farmer et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: