Explicit functions are widely used to interpolate, extrapolate, and differentiate theoretical or experimental data on the equation of state (EOS) of a solid. We present two EOS functions which are theoretically motivated. The simplest realistic model for a simple metal, the stabilized jellium (SJ) or structureless pseudopotential model, is the paradigm for our SJEOS. A simple metal with exponentially overlapped ion cores is the paradigm for an augmented version (ASJEOS) of the SJEOS. For the three solids tested (Al, Li, Mo), the ASJEOS matches all-electron calculations better than prior equations of state. Like most of the prior EOS's, the ASJEOS predicts pressure P as a function of compressed volume v from only a few equilibrium inputs: the volume v₀, the bulk modulus B₀, and its pressure derivative B₁. Under expansion, the cohesive energy serves as another input. A further advantage of the new equation of state is that these equilibrium properties other than v₀ may be found by linear fitting methods. The SJEOS can be used to correct B₀ and the EOS found from an approximate density functional, if the corresponding error in v₀ is known. We also (a) estimate the typically small contribution of phonon zero-point vibration to the EOS, (b) find that the physical hardness Bv does not maximize at equilibrium, and (c) show that the ``ideal metal'' of Shore and Rose is the zero-valence limit of stabilized jellium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alchagirov et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: