Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper we critically evaluate the literature of evidence–based psychosocial interventions for children diagnosed with ADHD. Our paper is structured around five main criticisms. First, the evidence–based psychosocial interventions are formulated on the basis of the categorical diagnosis of ADHD which is an ambiguous diagnostic entity. Second, they claim homogeneity among children diagnosed with ADHD. Third, they diffuse non–pedagogical language in education. The fourth criticism refers to the methodological bias by which evidence is produced. The fifth and final criticism describes how this body of literature promotes a pedagogical practice that relies on manualized approaches to be considered effective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koutsoklenis et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: