Why the study?
Does low-amplitude QRS on 12-lead ECG predict false-positive asystole alarms in ICU patients?
Does low-amplitude QRS on 12-lead ECG predict false-positive asystole alarms in ICU patients?
Low-amplitude QRS on 12-lead ECG is common in ICU patients but does not identify those at risk for false-positive asystole alarms during continuous monitoring.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low-amplitude QRS does not predict false-positive asystole alarms; leaves open validation of alternative ECG predictors in ICU monitoring.
BACKGROUND: Although electrocardiographic monitoring is valuable for continuous surveillance of intensive care unit (ICU) patients, false alarms are common and have been cited as a cause of alarm fatigue. ANSI/AAMI EC12:2002 states that electrocardiograms (ECGs) should not detect a QRS if the waveform is less than 0.15 mV (1.5 mm) for adult patients, in order to avoid mislabeling P waves or baseline noise as QRSs during complete heart block or asystole. However, ECG software algorithms often use more conservative QRS thresholds, which may result in false-positive asystole alarms in patients with low-amplitude QRS complexes. OBJECTIVES: To 1) assess the frequency of low QRS amplitude in a group of ICU patients with one or more false-positive asystole alarms and 2) determine whether low-amplitude QRSs are associated with false-positive asystole alarms during continuous ECG monitoring. METHODS: Hospital-acquired standard 12-lead ECGs were examined in a group of 82 ICU patients who had one or more false-positive asystole alarms. Low QRS amplitude was defined as a unidirectional (only positive or negative) QRS of less than 5 mm in two of four leads (I, II, III, and V1). RESULTS: Low-amplitude QRSs were present in 45 of 82 (55%) patients. The presence of low-amplitude QRSs did not differ according to age, sex, or race. Patients treated in the cardiac ICU had the highest proportion of low-amplitude QRSs. An equivalent proportion of patients had false-positive asystole alarms by group (no low-amplitude QRSs 95% vs. low-amplitude QRSs 87%; P = 0.229). Eight patients (10%) had both true- and false-positive asystole alarms (two [5%] with no low-amplitude QRSs and six [13%] with low-amplitude QRSs; P = 0.229). CONCLUSION: Low-amplitude QRS, as assessed from hospital 12-lead ECGs, occurs frequently and is more common in cardiac ICU patients. However, this ECG feature did not identify patients with false-positive asystole alarms during continuous ECG monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pelter et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: