Of a series of five newly synthesized 2'-deoxyuridine derivatives, including 5-vinyl-dUrd, 5-ethynyl-dUrd, 5-(1-chlorovinyl)-dUrd, (E)-5-(2-bromovinyl)-dUrd, and (E)-5-(2-iodovinyl)-dUrd, the last two compounds were found to exert a marked inhibitory effect on the replication of herpes simplex virus type 1 [ID50 (mean inhibitory dose), 0.004-0.02 microgram/ml]. Both (E)-5-(2-bromovinyl)-dUrd and (E)-5-(2-iodovinyl)-dUrd were highly selective in their anti-herpes activity in that they did not affect the growth or metabolism of the host (primary rabbit kidney) cells unless drug concentrations were used that were 5,000- to 10,000-fold greater than those required to inhibit virus multiplication. In this sense (E)-5-(2-bromovinyl)-dUrd and (E)-5-(2-iodovinyl)-dUrd proved more selective in their activity against herpes simplex virus type 1 than all other anti-herpes compounds that have been described so far. In animal model systems (namely, cutaneous herpes infections of athymic nude mice), (E)-5-(2-bromovinyl)-dUrd suppressed the development of herpetic skin lesions and mortality therewith associated, whether the compound was administered topically or systemically. Under the same conditions, the standard anti-herpes drug 5-iodo-dUrd (Idoxuridine) offered little, if any, protection. Although the precise mechanism of action of (E)-5-(2-bromovinyl)-dUrd and (E)-5-(2-iodovinyl)-dUrd remains to be established, preliminary findings indicate that they do not specifically act at the thymidylate synthetase step.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clercq et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: