A series of Ca(2+) oscillations during mammalian fertilization is necessary and sufficient to stimulate meiotic resumption and pronuclear formation. It is not known how effectively development continues in the absence of the initial Ca(2+) signal. We have triggered parthenogenetic egg activation with cycloheximide that causes no Ca(2+) increase, with ethanol that causes a single large Ca(2+) increase, or with Sr(2+) that causes Ca(2+) oscillations. Eggs were co-treated with cytochalasin D to make them diploid and they formed pronuclei and two-cell embryos at high rates with each activation treatment. However, far fewer of the embryos that were activated by cycloheximide reached the blastocyst stagecompared tothose activated by Sr(2+) orethanol. Any cycloheximide-activated embryos that reached the blastocyst stage had a smaller inner cell mass number and a greater rate of apoptosis than Sr(2+)-activated embryos. The poor development of cycloheximide-activated embryos was due to the lack of Ca(2+) increase because they developed to blastocyst stages at high rates when co-treated with Sr(2+) or ethanol. Embryos activated by either Sr(2+) or cycloheximide showed similar signs of initial embryonic genome activation (EGA) when measured using a reporter gene. However, microarray analysis of gene expression at the eight-cell stage showed that activation by Sr(2+) leads to a distinct pattern of gene expression from that seen with embryos activated by cycloheximide. These data suggest that activation of mouse eggs in the absence of a Ca(2+) signal does not affect initial parthenogenetic events, but can influence later gene expression and development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rogers et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: