Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The structural characteristics of CH…M and NH…M groups in square planar d8-ML4 metal complexes are examined and compared w those for CH…M groups in unambiguously agostic d6-ML5 systems. The NH…M(d8) systems have the linear geometry typical o bonds, not the bent geometry typical of agostic species. As proposed by Brammer, the NH…M(d8) systems are best regarded as hydrogen bonds, but the CH…M(d8) systems are intermediate in geometry between the hydrogen bonded NH…M systems and the true agostic CH…M of the d6 cases and are neither typical of hydrogen bonds nor typical agostic species.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yao et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: