The phosphinimines Ph 3 PNR (R = Ph 1, 2,6-Me 2 C 6 H 3 2, 3,5-Me 2 C 6 H 3 3, 2,6- i- Pr 2 C 6 H 3 4 ) were prepared and used to generate the species of the form [Li( o -C 6 H 4 PPh 2 NR)] 2 ·Et 2 O (R = Ph 5, 2,6-Me 2 C 6 H 3 6, 3,5-Me 2 C 6 H 3 7, 2,6- i -Pr 2 C 6 H 3 8 ). Subsequent reactions with [Rh(μ-Cl)(COD)] 2 gave the complexes Rh(COD)( o -C 6 H 4 PPh 2 NR) (R = Ph 9, 2,6-Me 2 C 6 H 3 10, 3,5-Me 2 C 6 H 3 11, 2,6- i -Pr 2 C 6 H 3 12 ). Similarly, the Ir analogue of 9 ( 13 ) was prepared using [Ir(μ-Cl)(COD)] 2 . The reaction of 9 with (CH 2 PPh 2 ) 2 afforded Rh(PPh 2 CH 2 CH 2 PPh 2 )( o -C 6 H 4 PPh 2 NPh) ( 14 ). Compound 9 was also shown to react with CH 2 Cl 2 to give two products, one of which was confirmed to be [Rh( o -C 6 H 4 PPh 2 NPh)(CH 2 - o -C 6 H 4 PPh 2 NPh)(μ-Cl) 2 Rh(COD)] ( 15 ). Similar treatment of 10 and 12 with CH 2 Cl 2 showed no reaction, while reaction of 11 with CH 2 Cl 2 gave a mixture of unidentified products. The related imidazole-phosphinimine ligands (N 2 C 3 H 3 )PPh 2 NR (R = Ph 18, 2,6-Me 2 C 6 H 3 19 ) were also prepared. These ligands react with NaH to give the corresponding Na-imidazolate-phosphinimines, 20 and 21, and subsequent reaction with [Rh(μ-Cl)(COD)] 2 gave the complexes Rh(COD)((N 2 C 3 H 2 )PPh 2 NR) (R = Ph 22, 2,6-Me 2 C 6 H 3 23 ). The compounds 22 and 23 do not react with CH 2 Cl 2 . The effects of steric and electronic modifications to the ligands on oxidative addition of C−Cl bonds are discussed. DFT calculations were performed on the model fragments [Rh((C 6 H 4 )PH 2 NH)] and [Rh((N 2 C 3 H 2 )PH 2 NH)], and the calculated atomic charges provide some insight into the reactivity of these compounds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chan et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: