Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Point‐nonpoint trading has been suggested as a relatively efficient approach for reducing nutrient pollution in the Chesapeake Bay and elsewhere. However, relatively little economic research has examined the design of trading programs involving nonpoint sources. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the economics of several fundamental design choices for point‐nonpoint trading programs. The Susquehanna River Basin (SRB) in Pennsylvania as an example, although many of the insights should generally apply to other regions as well.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horan et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: