Aim. Prior research concentrated on testifying to the presence of the semantic activation of semantic radicals as well as the separate role of a couple of modulating factors like Transparency of the phonograms, Position of semantic radicals, and Authenticity of the phonograms. However, the combined and hierarchical effects of these factors on non-character semantic accessibility remain largely unexplored. The present study, first proposed a hypothesis on the semantic accessibility hierarchy of non-character semantic radicals, and empirically investigated the hypothesis. Materials and Design. The experiment adopted a 2 (Prime type: body effector vs. Asterisk *) × 6 (Target type: transparent phonograms embedding non-character effector semantic radical on the left [TPA1] vs. opaque phonograms embedding non-character effector semantic radical on the left [TPA2] vs. pseudo-characters embedding non-character effector semantic radical on the left [TPA3] vs. pseudo-characters embedding non-character effector semantic radical on the right [TPA4] vs. TPAcontrol1 vs. TPAcontrol2) design. The prime type comprised three effector-based characters: “脚” (/jiao3/, foot), “嘴”(/zui3/, mouth), and “手” (/shou3/, hand), together with a control asterisk “*”. A primed lexical decision task was administered to 30 native Mandarin-speaking participants. Results. Data of 26 participants were retained for analysis, yielding a mean accuracy of 93.62%. Trials with errors or reaction times exceeding 3 SD were excluded prior to analysis. Significant priming effects were observed across most target conditions, with effect magnitudes partially confirming the proposed hierarchy: the highest semantic accessibility was observed for non-character semantic radicals left-positioned in pseudo-characters (TPA3), followed by those right-positioned in pseudo-characters (TPA4), then those left-positioned in transparent phonograms (TPA1), and the lowest for those left-positioned in opaque phonograms (TPA2). Conclusions. The semantic behavior of non-character semantic radicals was shaped by the host phonograms configured by such modulating factors as phonograms’ transparency, authenticity, and semantic radicals’ position.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: