In vitro study demonstrates LL-37 enantiomers stimulate cancer cell migration via TRPV2 and BKCa channels, suggesting membrane physical alterations drive metastatic behavior.
// Audrey Gambade 1, * , Sami Zreika 2, * , Maxime Guéguinou 1, 3 , Igor Chourpa 4 , Gaëlle Fromont 1, 3, 5 , Ana Maria Bouchet 1, 3 , Julien Burlaud-Gaillard 4 , Marie Potier-Cartereau 1, 3 , Sébastien Roger 1 , Vincent Aucagne 6 , Stéphan Chevalier 1 , Christophe Vandier 1, 3 , Caroline Goupille 1, 5, * , Günther Weber 1, 4, * 1 Inserm, UMR1069, Nutrition, Croissance et Cancer, Tours, France 2 Department of Medical Lab Technology, Jinan University, Tripoli, Lebanon 3 Ion channel network Canceropole Grand Ouest 4 Université François Rabelais, Tours, France 5 CHRU Hôpital Bretonneau, Tours, France 6 Centre de Biophysique Moléculaire, CNRS UPR 4301, Orléans, France * These authors are contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Günther Weber, e-mail: gunther.weber@univ-tours.fr Keywords: LL-37, calcium signaling, membrane association, cell migration, breast cancer Received: December 16, 2015 Accepted: February 28, 2016 Published: March 16, 2016 ABSTRACT Expression of the antimicrobial peptide hCAP18/LL-37 is associated to malignancy in various cancer forms, stimulating cell migration and metastasis. We report that LL-37 induces migration of three cancer cell lines by activating the TRPV2 calcium-permeable channel and recruiting it to pseudopodia through activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway. Ca 2+ entry through TRPV2 cooperated with a K + efflux through the BKCa channel. In a panel of human breast tumors, the expression of TRPV2 and LL-37 was found to be positively correlated. The D-enantiomer of LL-37 showed identical effects as the L-peptide, suggesting that no binding to a specific receptor was involved. LL-37 attached to caveolae and pseudopodia membranes and decreased membrane fluidity, suggesting that a modification of the physical properties of the lipid membrane bilayer was the underlying mechanism of its effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gambade et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: