Why the study?
Assessing quality of life in cardiovascular disease patients is critical for evaluating treatments and identifying areas to improve health outcomes, warranting characterization of publication trends to inform priority setting.
A bibliometric analysis of 6,457 papers from 1990-2018 shows a rising trend in research on interventions to improve quality of life in cardiovascular disease, identifying gaps in economic evaluations and mental health interventions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rising CVD quality-of-life publication trends extend research scope; leaves open gaps in economic evaluations and mental health interventions.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) have been the global health problems that cause a substantial burden for the patients and the society. Assessing the Quality of Life (QOL) of CVD patients is critical in the effectiveness evaluation of CVD treatments as well as in determining potential areas for enhancing health outcomes. Through the adoption of a combination of bibliometric approach and content analysis, publications trend and the common topics regarding interventions to improve QOL of CVD patients were searched and characterized to inform priority setting and policy development. METHODS: Bibliographic data of publications published from 1990 to 2018 on interventions to improve QOL of CVD patients were retrieved from Web of Science. Network graphs illustrating the terms co-occurrence clusters were created by VOSviewer software. Latent Dirichlet Allocation approach was adopted to classify papers into major research topics. RESULTS: A total of 6457 papers was analyzed. We found a substantial increase in the number of publications, citations, and the number of download times of papers in the last 5 years. There has been a rise in the number of papers related to intervention to increase quality of life among patients with CVD during 1990-2018. Conventional therapies (surgery and medication), and psychological, behavioral interventions were common research topics. Meanwhile, the number of papers evaluating economic effectiveness has not been as high as that of other topics. CONCLUSIONS: The research areas among the scientific studies emphasized the importance of interdisciplinary and inter-sectoral approaches in both evaluation and intervention. Future research should be a focus on economic evaluation of intervention as well as interventions to reduce mental issues among people with CVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tran et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: