Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Etingof, Nikshych and Ostrik asked if every fusion category can be completely defined over a cyclotomic field. We show that this is not the case: in particular, one of the fusion categories coming from the Haagerup subfactor and one coming from the newly constructed extended Haagerup subfactor cannot be completely defined over a cyclotomic field. On the other hand, we show that the Drinfel’d center of the even part of the Haagerup subfactor is completely defined over a cyclotomic field. We identify the minimal field of definition for each of these fusion categories, compute the Galois groups, and identify their Galois conjugates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2012 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: