Why the study?
Congenital heart disease is associated with decreased birthweight compared to population references, but whether this difference persists when controlling for familial confounders using siblings was unknown.
Is isolated congenital heart disease associated with lower birthweight compared to unaffected siblings?
Is isolated congenital heart disease associated with lower birthweight compared to unaffected siblings?
Isolated congenital heart disease is associated with lower birthweight independent of shared maternal and environmental factors.
Supports isolated CHD association with lower birthweight beyond shared factors; hypothesis-generating for mechanisms and outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is associated with decreased birthweight (BW) compared to population-based references. The aim of this study was to compare the BW of isolated CHD cases to their siblings, thus controlling for unknown and unmeasured confounders within the family. METHODS: All isolated CHD cases in the Leiden University Medical Center were included (2002-2019). Generalized estimated equation models were constructed to compare BW z scores of CHD neonates with their siblings. Cases were clustered to minor or severe CHD and stratified according to the aortic flow and oxygenation to the brain. RESULTS: The overall BW z score of siblings was 0.032 (n = 471). The BW z score was significantly lower in CHD cases (n = 291) compared to their siblings (-0.20, p = 0.005). The results were consistent in the subgroup analysis of severe and minor CHD (BW z score difference -0.20 and -0.10), but did not differ significantly (p = 0.63). Stratified analysis regarding flow and oxygenation showed no BW difference between the groups (p = 0.1). CONCLUSION: Isolated CHD cases display a significantly lower BW z score compared to their siblings. As the siblings of these CHD cases show a BW distribution similar to the general population, this suggests that shared environmental and maternal influences between siblings do not explain the difference in BW.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aliasi et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: