Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
New piano-stool ruthenium(II) complexes, [Ru(η6-C6H6)L1]2+, [Ru(η6-C6H6)(L2)Cl]+, [Ru(η6-C6H6)(L3)Cl]+, [Ru(η-C6H6)(L4)Cl]+ and [Ru(η6-C6H6)(L5)Cl]+ have been isolated as their hexafluorophosphate salts by bridge-cleavage reactions of [{Ru(η6-C6H6)Cl2}2] in methanol with the potentially tri- and bi-dentate nitrogen-containing ligands [2-(2-pyridyl)ethyl](2-pyridylmethyl)methylamine (L1), 2,6-bis(pyrazol-1-ylmethyl)pyridine (L2) and its tetramethyl-substituted derivative (L3), 2-(pyrazol-1-ylmethyl)pyridine (L4) and its dimethyl derivative (L5). The structures of these compounds in MeCN solution have been elucidated by 1H NMR spectroscopy. The complex [Ru(η6-C6H6)L1][PF6]2 has been characterized by single-crystal X-ray crystallography: triclinic, space group P(no. 2), a= 7.790(3), b= 10.039(3). c= 16.679(5)Å, α= 88.31 (2), β= 83.15(3), γ= 77.1 9(3)° and Z= 2. The structure has been refined to an R factor of 0.063 based on 5330 observed reflections. Average Ru–C and Ru–N (two types) bond lengths are 2.202(6) and 2.114(5) and 2.170(5)Å respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shirin et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: