If Capital is read as a work in systematic dialectics, early and later stages of the work do not relate externally as model and concrete reality. Both are instead different conceptualizations of the same totality. On this reading standard objections to the so-called “transformation problem” dissipate. An appreciation of dialectics also enables a deeper comprehension of Marx's key notions of “value” and “abstract labor.”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tony Smith (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: