Attempts to prepare fluoroalkyl(hydrido) complexes of iridium by reactions of [Ir(C 5 Me 5 )(PMe 3 )(R F )I] {R F = CF 2 CF 2 CF 3, CF(CF 3 ) 2 } with either NaBH 4 or LiAlH 4 afford (inter alia) iridium hydrides [Ir(C 5 Me 5 )(PMe 3 )(CH CFCF 3 )H] or [Ir(C 5 Me 5 )(PMe 3 )(C{CF 3 } CF 2 )H], in which the fluoroalkyl groups are converted to unsaturated ligands via apparent α-CF activation and elimination of HF. A clean and selective route to desired saturated fluoroalkyl(hydrido) complexes [Ir(C 5 Me 5 )(PMe 3 )(R F )H] {R F = CF 2 CF 2 CF 3, CF 2 CF 3, CF(CF 3 ) 2 } is afforded by treatment of the aqua cations [Ir(C 5 Me 5 )(PMe 3 )(R F )(H 2 O)]BF 4 with 1,8-bis(dimethylamino)naphthalene (“Proton Sponge”). The reaction also affords the corresponding rhodium analogue [Rh(C 5 Me 5 )(PMe 3 )(CF 2 CF 2 CF 3 )H] from the corresponding aqua precursor. The source of the hydride is unambiguously defined as an N−CH 3 group by using the perdeuteromethylated analogue of Proton Sponge, which provides clean routes to the corresponding fluoroalkyl(deutero) complexes of iridium. Triethylamine or cobaltocene also effect this reaction, though not as cleanly as Proton Sponge. The mechanism of this novel transformation is discussed. The fluoroalkyl(hydrido) complexes are thermally robust, but do react with chlorinated solvents to give the corresponding chlorides. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies of the structures of [Ir(C 5 Me 5 )(PMe 3 )(CF 2 CF 2 CF 3 )H], [Rh(C 5 Me 5 )(PMe 3 )(CF 2 CF 2 CF 3 )H], and [Rh(C 5 Me 5 )(PMe 3 )(CF 2 CF 2 CF 3 )Cl] are reported and compared.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hughes et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: