Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A new neutral tridentate 1,4,6-trimethyl-6-pyrrolidin-1-yl-1,4-diazepane ( L ) was prepared. Reacting L with trialkyls M(CH 2 SiMe 3 ) 3 (THF) 2 (M = Sc, Y) and tribenzyls M(CH 2 Ph) 3 (THF) 3 (M = Sc, La) yielded trialkyl complexes ( L )M(CH 2 SiMe 3 ) 3 (M = Sc, 1; M = Y, 2 ) and tribenzyl complexes ( L )M(CH 2 Ph) 3 (M = Sc, 3; M = La, 4 ). Complexes 1 and 2 can be converted to their corresponding ionic compounds [( L )M(CH 2 SiMe 3 ) 2 (THF)][B(C 6 H 5 ) 4 ] (M = Sc, 5; M = Y, 6 ) by reaction with [PhNMe 2 H][B(C 6 H 5 ) 4 ] in THF. Complexes 3 and 4 can be converted to cationic species [(L)M(CH 2 Ph) 2 ] + by reaction with [PhNMe 2 H][B(C 6 F 5 ) 4 ] in C 6 D 5 Br in the absence of THF. The neutral complexes 1 − 4 and their cationic derivatives were studied as catalysts for the hydroamination/cyclization of 2,2-diphenylpent-4-en-1-amine and N -methylpent-4-en-1-amine reference substrates and compared with ligand-free Sc, Y, and La neutral and cationic catalysts. The most effective catalysts in the series were the cationic L -yttrium catalyst (for 2,2-diphenylpent-4-en-1-amine) and the cationic lanthanum systems (for N -methylpent-4-en-1-amine). For the La catalysts, evidence was obtained for release of L from the metal during catalysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ge et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: