Seven new metal−organic frameworks (MOFs) [Cu(bib) 2 (H 2 O) 2 ](Cl 3 CCOO) 2 ·2MeOH·2H 2 O ( 1 ), [Cu(bib) 2 ]Cl 2 ·H 2 O ( 2 ), [Cu(bib) 2 (SO 4 )(H 2 O)]·4H 2 O ( 3 ), [Cu(bib)(SO 4 )(H 2 O) 2 ] ( 4 ), [Cu(bib)(N 3 )(OAc)]·DMF ( 5 ) (OAc = acetate), [Cu(bib)(ox)]·MeOH·2H 2 O ( 6 ) (ox = oxalate), and [Cu(bib)(mal)]·MeOH ( 7 ) (mal = malonate) were obtained by reactions of flexible bidentate ligand 1-bromo-3,5-bis(imidazol-1-ylmethyl)benzene (bib) with corresponding copper(II) salts. The structures of these MOFs were established by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. Complexes 1 and 2 have similar one-dimensional (1D) hinged chain structure. Complex 3 has a 2D network structure with (4,4) topology. Complex 4 has M 2 L 2 metallocyclic ring structure and the rings are further linked by the sulfate anions to form a 1D tube-like chain. Complex 5 is also a dinuclear M 2 L 2 metallocyclic ring, which is further connected by Br···Br interactions to form 1D chain. While in the cases of complexes 6 and 7, both have 2D network structure in which the oxalate and malonate anions act as bridging ligands. The results showed that the counteranions play important roles in the construction of MOFs. In addition, the magnetic properties of complexes 6 and 7 were investigated. The results show that weak ferromagnetic interactions occurred between the copper(II) ions linked by the oxalate anions in complex 6, and there is no obvious magnetic interaction between the copper(II) ions bridged by the malonate anions in complex 7 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meng et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: