Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Both 14 C-clopyralid (3,6-dichloropicolinic acid) and 14 C-chlorsulfuron {2-chloro- N -[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]benzensulfonamide} were readily absorbed by Canada thistle [ Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. ♯ CIRAR] leaves, with 99 and 75%, respectively, of the applied doses absorbed 144 h after application. Absorbed 14 C-clopyralid was rapidly exported from the treated leaves, whereas 14 C-chlorsulfuron was translocated much more slowly. After 144 h, 29% of the applied 14 C-clopyralid and 5% of the applied 14 C-chlorsulfuron were recovered in the roots and developing root buds of Canada thistle plants. Smaller amounts of the two herbicides were absorbed and translocated in perennial sowthistle ( Sonchus arvensis L. ♯ SONAR) than in Canada thistle. More 14 C-clopyralid than 14 C-chlorsulfuron was absorbed and translocated out of treated leaves of perennial sowthistle, but equal amounts, 3 to 4% of the applied doses, were recovered in the roots and root buds 144 h after application. Foliar applications of clopyralid, followed by removal of the treated shoot 24, 72, or 144 h after application, markedly reduced shoot regrowth in both Canada thistle and perennial sowthistle. Similar treatment with chlorsulfuron did not prevent shoot regrowth in either species.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Devine et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: